Whether under Section 482 of the Cr.PC High Cout can quash the criminal proceedings against the original Accused which were for the offences under Sections 307, 294 read with Section 34 of the IPC, solely on the ground of settlement of the dispute the original Complainant and Accused ?

State Preferred Appeal Apex court held that the original Accused was facing the criminal proceedings under Sections 307, 294 read … Continue reading Whether under Section 482 of the Cr.PC High Cout can quash the criminal proceedings against the original Accused which were for the offences under Sections 307, 294 read with Section 34 of the IPC, solely on the ground of settlement of the dispute the original Complainant and Accused ?

Whether charge framed under Sec.307 IPC is correct basing on the the material/evidence on record and the medical certificate and the injuries sustained by the complainant ? – No-

Original Complainant that, in fact, approximately 17 to 18 persons attacked and beaten the complainant with an intention to commit … Continue reading Whether charge framed under Sec.307 IPC is correct basing on the the material/evidence on record and the medical certificate and the injuries sustained by the complainant ? – No-

Whether sec. 80 DD [2 ] [a] – explanatory circular Circular No. CO/CRM/PS/622/23 dated January 24, 2008 and its proviso, denying the benefit of the insurance to the handicapped persons to get annuity or lumpsum amount during the lifetime of the parent/guardian of such a handicapped person, whereas the beneficiaries of other life insurance policy are getting annuity during the lifetime of the person who has taken insurance policy – violates the fundamental right of equality of the handicapped person enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution. ?

Public interest litigation – Sec.80 DD of Income Tax Act – “80DD. Deduction in respect of maintenance including medical treatment … Continue reading Whether sec. 80 DD [2 ] [a] – explanatory circular Circular No. CO/CRM/PS/622/23 dated January 24, 2008 and its proviso, denying the benefit of the insurance to the handicapped persons to get annuity or lumpsum amount during the lifetime of the parent/guardian of such a handicapped person, whereas the beneficiaries of other life insurance policy are getting annuity during the lifetime of the person who has taken insurance policy – violates the fundamental right of equality of the handicapped person enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution. ?